As everyone who would read this blog knows by now, it was recently discovered that a change had been made to the Church’s administrative guide, Handbook, Part 1, which declared that members in same-sex marriages were to be considered apostates, and that banned children of members in same-sex marriages from being blessed as babies, or baptized without First Presidency clearance, and only after such a child “specifically disavows the practice of same-gender cohabitation and marriage”—effectively stating that they do not support the same-sex marriage of their parent (who may well have raised the child).
This much is well-known, not just among Church members, but
well beyond the boundaries of the Church, as national media have taken up this
story. Also becoming increasingly well-known is the immense pain that this
policy change is causing even now, not even a full week after the change became
known. People have decried the pain this is causing to themselves, and to their
children. Suicide attempts in Utah have spiked. People—formerly faithful
members, including straight family members affected by this change—are leaving
the Church over this policy change; one account puts the number who are
submitting resignations of their Church membership at over one thousand.
What I do not think is as widely recognized is the degree to
which this is a watershed moment for the Church. Things will never be the same in
the Church after this moment; the only question is, in what direction will the
Church go?
What is a watershed? Geologically, it is a place on a land
mass that separates the rivers and streams that flow in one direction (say,
east) from those that flow in another direction (say, west). Metaphorically, a
watershed moment is an event that changes the direction of a movement, even a
war. The Kennedy assassination was a watershed moment in American history;
never afterward could one feel that ‘everything is under control.’ The
development of the Salk and Sabin vaccines were watershed moments in the fight
to eradicate polio.
People rarely realize that, although watershed moments
create change, the nature of that change is up in the air in the early part of
the watershed moment. Things can work out in several different ways. And that
is the situation in the Church today: we will not come out of this as the very
same organization, the very same people, as we were when we entered it. But in
what way will we and the Church be different? That all depends.
Below, I list several ways in which the Church could
be different—if we make it so.
This is thus the index post of a brief series of blog posts
that I will be issuing over the next few days, regarding ways in which the
Church could develop in positive directions because of the turmoil caused by
the policy change. I see these changes as potentially including the following:
- A redefining of the nature of ‘General Authority’ in the Church.
- Increased transparency in the Church.
- A refocusing on the central Gospel message.
- A destigmatization of homosexuality and same-sex marriage.
I shall conclude the series with a post on how members of
the Church can nurture these sorts of outcomes.
- - - - - - -
Readers are welcome to comment on this post, below.
I invite you to become a “follower” of this blog through the
box in the upper-right-hand corner of this page, to be informed of future
posts.
I discuss the growth of the Church of Jesus Christ in my
book, The Rise of the Mormons, and I discuss
another important issue in my book, Latter-day Saint
Women and the Priesthood of God (both available here.)
Visit the page of “That Mormon Guy Mark” on Facebook.
Visit Mark
Koltko-Rivera’s website.
Mark Koltko-Rivera’s
LDS bio.
Copyright 2015 Mark E. Koltko-Rivera. All Rights
Reserved.
